|
Read on and
find that later Henry II married Catherine de Medici and loved Diane de
Poitiers, and that, fortunately for France, both his queen and his
mistress were patronesses of the arts. So France bloomed in the sunshine
of royal favor and Greek influence, as few countries ever had.
Fontainebleau
(begun by Francis I) was the first of a chain of French royal palaces, all
monuments without and within, to a picturesque system of monarchy, Kings
who could do no wrong, wafting scepters over powerless subjects, whose
toil produced Art in the form of architecture, cabinetmaking, tapestry
weaving, mural decoration, unrivalled porcelain, exquisitely wrought
silver and gold plate, silks, lovely as flower gardens (showing the
"pomegranate" and "vase" patterns) and velvets like
the skies! And for what? Did these things represent the wise planning of
wise monarchs for dependent subjects?
We know better, for
it is only in modern times that simple living and small incomes have
achieved surroundings of artistic beauty and comfort. The marvels of
interior decoration during the classic French periods were created for
kings and their queens, mistresses and favored courtiers.
Diane de Poitiers
wished perhaps only dreamed and an epoch-making art project was born.
Madame du Barry admired and made her own the since famous du Barry rose
color, and the Sevres porcelain factories reproduced it for her. But how
to produce this particular illusive shade of deep, purplish-pink became a
forgotten art, when the seductive person of the king's mistress was no
more.
If you would learn
all there is to know concerning the sixteenth century furnishings in
France read Edmund Bonneffe's "Sixteenth Century Furniture."
It was the Henry II
interior decoration and architecture which first showed the Renaissance of
pure line and classic proportion, followed by the never-failing reaction
from the simple line to the undulating over-ornate when decoration
repeated the elaboration of the most luxurious, licentious periods of the
past.
One has but to walk
through the royal palaces of France to see French history beguilingly
illustrated, in a series of volumes open to all, the pages of which are
vibrant with the names and personalities of men and women who will always
live in history as products of an age of great culture and art.
The Louis XIV, XV
and XVI periods in furniture are all related. Rare brocades, flowered and
in stripes, bronze mounts as garlands, bow-
Knots and rosettes,
on intricate inlaying, mark their common relationship. The story of these
periods is that gradually decoration becomes over-elaborated and in the
end dominates the Greek outline,
The three Louis
mark a succession of great periods. Louis XIV, though beautiful at its
best, is of the three the most ornate and is characterized in its worst
stage by the extremely bowed (cabriole) legs of the furniture, ludicrously
suggestive of certain debauched courtiers who surrounded the Grande
Monarch.
Louis XV legs show
a curve, also, but no longer the stodgy, squat cabriole of the overfed
gallant. Instead we are entranced by an ethereal grace and lightness of
movement in every line and decoration. Here cabriole means but a courtly
knee swiftly bending to salute some beauty's hand. So subtly waving is the
curving outline of this furniture that one scarcely knows where it begins
or ends, and it is the same with the decorations exquisitely delicate
waving traceries of vines and flora, gold on gold, inlay, or paint in
delicate tones.
All this gives to
the Louis XV period supremacy over Louis XVI, whose round, grooved,
tapering straight legs, one tires of more quickly, although fine gold and
lovely paint make this type winning and beloved.

Corner of a
Drawing Room, Furniture Showing Directoire influence
A delightful bit
of a room. The furniture, in line, shows a Directoire influence. The
striped French satin on sofa and one chair is blue, yellow and faun, the
Brussels tapestry in faded blues, fauns and grays. Over a charmingly
painted table is a Louis XV gilt appliqué, the screen is dark in tone and
has painted panels.
The rug, done
in cross-stitch, black ground and design in colors, was discovered in a
forgotten corner of a shop, its condition so dingy from the dust of ages
that only an expert would have recognized its possibilities.
From Louis XVI we
pass to the Directoire, when, following the Revolution, the voice of the
populace decried all ostentation and everything savoring of the
superfluous. The Great Napoleon in his first period affected simplicity
and there were no longer bronze mounts, in rosettes, garlands and
bow-knots, elaborate inlaying, nor painted furniture with lovely flowering
surfaces; in the most severe examples not even fluted legs! Instead,
simple but delicately proportioned furniture with slender, squarely cut,
chastely tapering legs, arms and backs, was the fashion.
In fact, the
Directoire type is one of ideal proportions, graceful outlines with a
flowing movement and the decoration when present, kept well within bounds,
entirely subservient to the main structural material. One feels an almost
Quaker-like quality about the Directoire, whether of natural wood or plain
painted surface.
With Napoleon's
assumption of regal power and habits, we get the Empire (he had been to
Rome and Egypt), pseudo-classic in outline and richly ornamented with
mounts in ormoulu characteristic of the Louis.
The Empire period
in furniture was dethroned by the succeeding regime.
When we see old
French chairs with leather seats and backs, sometimes embossed, in the
Portuguese style, with small regular design, put on with heavy nails and
twisted or straight stretchers (pieces of wood extending between legs of
chairs), we know that they belong to the time of Henry IV or Louis XIII.
Some of the large chairs show the shell design in their broad, elaborate
stretchers.
The beautiful
small side tables of the Louis and First Empire called consoles, were made
for the display of their marvelously wrought pieces of silver, hammered
and chiseled by hand, "museum pieces," indeed, and lucky is the collector
who chances upon any specimen adrift.
|